Skip to main content

Reintroduction of the Zimbabwe Dollar

Well I just read the funniest thing in the paper the other day please read this first and tell me what you think http://t.co/9ClMiiMo .I am not the foremost expert on monetary economics but this does not make sense. Our government is thinking of reintroducing a currency that was not actually accepted as a form of trade when finally was withdrawn. Well I can't think that this is an immediate strategy, however, I fear for the recovery of the economy if this is the case.

The key factors that led to the decline of the Zim Dollar are still very present in the economy un-competitive export regime, large demand for imported luxury goods, the economy is dominated by government and psuedo-government operations, and large parts of the manufacturing industry survived on protectionist policies to allow them to operate. All this is added upon by the fact that political players from the main political parties are so polarized, that making a decision to act for the good of the country often falls a very distant third in their priorities. First and second in their priorities are political points and accumulation of wealth. Think I am joking? A few weeks ago government was held to ransom by parliament who threatened to delay passing of the budget if they did not get their perks (cars and sitting allowances). This despite the fact that they have yet to address civil servant concerns... but I digress.

Before we can argue for or against the return of the Zim dollar. I must explain the role of money in a society. Money has three main roles, namely:
1. medium of exchange - a means to determine value during the exchange of goods and services.
2. a unit of account - a means to compare the values of goods and services.
3. a store of wealth - used to maintain the value of a transaction over time.

So if you look at the role of money, quite simply all you need to do to return the Zim Dollar back into the is to legislate it. But will it be good for the economy? There is consensus that for money to be considered good it must have the following ba characteristics.
1. Acceptability - Everyone must accept it to purchase goods and services

2. Durability - It should last a long time

3. Portability - Easy to carry around

4. Scarcity - Scarce enough to be valuable, not common such as sand or pebbles on a beach

5. Divisibility - Can be divided into small units

Read more: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Characteristics_of_good_money#ixzz1gKirOq00

Now the Zim dollar died a natural death when it failed the first characteristic. The economy naturally rejected the Zim dollar to the extent civil servants couldn't purchase anything with their salaries. Soldiers even rioted in town when their money couldn't buy anything.

Essentially the Zim dollar cannot return until the central bank leadership has changed. whether they were right or wrong, the economy doesn't trust that team to manage the currency. We must just admit one thing. The currency will remain dead for some time yet even if the government will want to restore it. the currency will only be used for government transactions and repaying loans if it is returned in this current set up.

Just my thought

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The new world order

I have been following my favorite team, The Arsenal and it dawned on me, just like everything else you cannot win without the fundamentals.. The game against Manchester United showed that if you don't get the fundamentals of a balanced team right you concede two goals when you have just equalised and looking to take the lead. Today we have seen the fundamentals of a truly competitive squad being ignored and we have subs who come on and give a tepid performance. Now if these players understood that every game is a test, they would never have the word defeat on their mind. Everytime they put on the shirt they should be playing to impress.. too many coasters. The same needs to be said of too many leaders on the African continent when it comes to the governance of their countries. I am no politician but what I have seen in my home of Zimbabwe is enough to make a young economist wonder what their intention is? Do people intentionally want to destroy the place of my youth? Are these

When rock Bottom has a basement- A call for monetary reform

Welcome to Zimbabwe ! Where we as a people have since 1955 (then we were called Rhodesia) argued verbose arguments based on ideology (race, tribe, economic system etc) that at its core keeps a certain class of people subjugated with another rich and powerful. these arguments often ignore reality on the ground. Often those in power are shook by this reality that often has far-reaching, earth-shattering consequences. We as a nation have seen reality take control every 25 or so years and really shake these dogmatic ideologies. The first was the racist Rhodesian government's ideology of white minority rule, or "Apartheid lite". The government of the day engaged in inward looking state-oriented economy that was built largely to meet the aspirations of the white minority. Our parents and those that came before them only gained value through serving these aspirations as labour (skilled or otherwise). 20 years of sanctions, civil disobedience and finally armed resistance led the

Zimbabwe Economic Reality

What is the value we create? That is  the issue to the new Zimbabwean economic reality. This question must be asked everyday, in every household and every sector of the economy. We cannot as a nation go forward without that. By adopting the multi-currency regime in Zimbabwe we effectively removed any ability to improve our competitiveness by manipulating exchange rates. This has been the trick that African economies have been using to essentially "protect" the economy. These policies have, in my opinion, kept our countries only competitive in the primary and extractive industries. This is why when we look at GDP growth in Africa, much of our economy as a continent is dependent on FDIs (Foriegn Direct Investment) and export of raw materials. I need to note that I am in no way against the tenets of FDI and export of Raw Materials, it must not be in the long term economic policy of a country to focus on that alone. Remember that today's FDI becomes tomorrow's divi